BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:IEEE vTools.Events//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:US/Pacific
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20210314T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:PDT
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20211107T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:PST
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20211023T224934Z
UID:8465B121-4F7F-497C-9A22-34DA44E949C8
DTSTART;TZID=US/Pacific:20211021T180000
DTEND;TZID=US/Pacific:20211021T184500
DESCRIPTION:A classification fusion technique using feature extraction and 
 fuzzy logic known as Feature Object Extraction is developed and applied to
  hypothesis-based decision problems such as cyber security and GPS attacks
 . The Feature Object Extraction approach is not a probabilistic approach t
 hat determines the odds of one hypothesis over another\, e.g.\, GPS Jammin
 g vs. Dropouts. Instead\, evidence to support or refute each hypothesis is
  accrued to create a degree of certainty. The feature-aided object extract
 ion technique was initially developed for the target classification proble
 m. Unlike probabilistic methods\, evidence that supports one hypothesis do
 es not necessarily refute the probability of another hypothesis. For examp
 le\, the U.S. Mint recently was overwhelmed during the opening of sales fo
 r limited edition coin sets. The evidence of the high volume on the site c
 ould indicate a denial-of-service attack or large numbers of customers. Th
 e relationship to the availability of limited-edition coins supports expec
 ted high traffic. It does not\, however\, refute a denial-of-service attac
 k\, as actually has occurred. Feature Object Extraction also allows for er
 roneous information and can recover where probabilistically a class can el
 iminated without the ability to recover. In one application\, cybersecurit
 y is interpreted as a sensor fusion problem that includes various alternat
 ive techniques into the solution space. GPS security\, where various jammi
 ng and spoofing techniques are possibilities\, the ability to discern the 
 type of attacks that are possible has been shown to be well suited for thi
 s evidence accrual technique.\n\nPost event: A recording (that has not bee
 n nicely edited) of this presentation is available here: [Link to Zoom Rec
 ording](https://abet-org.zoom.us/rec/share/risgLpg423ukiI5CTW3GAVT2XI0Eh0Q
 TNB4jnyQiez33S5yu8iIC4q5MRVdNGU7s.IYCNqpaBYhtbeI2J?startTime=1634863951000
 )\n\nCo-sponsored by: San Diego Chapter of the Aerospace Electronic System
 s Society\, Computer Chapter\, and Computational Intelligence Chapter\n\nS
 peaker(s): Prof. Kathleen A. Kramer\, \n\nAgenda: \n6:00pm pacific/9:00 pm
  eastern time - lecture begins\n\n(Virtual Meeting)\, Connection informati
 on will be supplied to all preregistered.\, San Diego\, California\, Unite
 d States\, Virtual: https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/282204
LOCATION:(Virtual Meeting)\, Connection information will be supplied to all
  preregistered.\, San Diego\, California\, United States\, Virtual: https:
 //events.vtools.ieee.org/m/282204
ORGANIZER:scstubberud@ieee.org
SEQUENCE:12
SUMMARY:Feature Object Extraction – Fusing Evidence\, Not Rolling the Die
URL;VALUE=URI:https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/282204
X-ALT-DESC:Description: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;A classification fusion technique using fe
 ature extraction and fuzzy logic known as Feature Object Extraction is dev
 eloped and applied to hypothesis-based decision problems such as cyber sec
 urity and GPS attacks.&amp;nbsp\; The Feature Object Extraction approach is no
 t a probabilistic approach that determines the odds of one hypothesis over
  another\, e.g.\, GPS Jamming vs. Dropouts.&amp;nbsp\; Instead\, evidence to s
 upport or refute each hypothesis is accrued to create a degree of certaint
 y. The feature-aided object extraction technique was initially developed f
 or the target classification problem.&amp;nbsp\; Unlike probabilistic methods\
 , evidence that supports one hypothesis does not necessarily refute the pr
 obability of another hypothesis.&amp;nbsp\; For example\, the U.S. Mint recent
 ly was overwhelmed during the opening of sales for limited edition coin se
 ts.&amp;nbsp\; The evidence of the high volume on the site could indicate a de
 nial-of-service attack or large numbers of customers.&amp;nbsp\; The relations
 hip to the availability of limited-edition coins supports expected high tr
 affic.&amp;nbsp\; It does not\, however\, refute a denial-of-service attack\, 
 as actually has occurred.&amp;nbsp\; &amp;nbsp\;Feature Object Extraction also all
 ows for erroneous information and can recover where probabilistically a cl
 ass can eliminated without the ability to recover. In one application\, cy
 bersecurity is interpreted as a sensor fusion problem that includes variou
 s alternative techniques into the solution space. GPS security\, where var
 ious jamming and spoofing techniques are possibilities\, the ability to di
 scern the type of attacks that are possible has been shown to be well suit
 ed for this evidence accrual technique.&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Post event: &amp;nbsp\;A r
 ecording (that has not been nicely edited) of this presentation is availab
 le here: &lt;a href=&quot;https://abet-org.zoom.us/rec/share/risgLpg423ukiI5CTW3GA
 VT2XI0Eh0QTNB4jnyQiez33S5yu8iIC4q5MRVdNGU7s.IYCNqpaBYhtbeI2J?startTime=163
 4863951000&quot;&gt;Link to Zoom Recording&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Agenda: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;
 p&gt;6:00pm pacific/9:00 pm eastern time - lecture begins&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp\;&lt;/p&gt;
 \n&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp\;&lt;/p&gt;
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

