BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:IEEE vTools.Events//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Toronto
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20220313T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:EDT
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20221106T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:EST
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20220506T134751Z
UID:9746360B-D510-4C3C-B436-0E653EE26DD2
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20220503T110000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20220503T120000
DESCRIPTION:The numerical solution of Maxwell’s time-dependent equations 
 plays a very useful role in electrical engineering\, physical chemistry an
 d photonics at the nanoscale. Maxwell’s equations constitute an involuti
 on-constrained PDE system. The equations can be cast as a regular hyperbol
 ic system of conservation laws and many innovations that have been develop
 ed in that area of study can be used to advantage even for computational e
 lectrodynamics (CED). However\, the structure of Maxwell’s equations is 
 inherently very different from that of other conservation laws\, with Fara
 day’s and Ampere’s laws having a curl-type update. This curl-type upda
 te also ensures that Gauss’ laws for charge and magnetic charge are natu
 rally satisfied. The highly popular and successful Finite Difference Time 
 Domain (FDTD) scheme can mimetically fulfil the goals of global constraint
  preservation\, treatment of perfectly matched layer (PML) boundary condit
 ions and inclusion of auxiliary differential equations (ADEs) for dispersi
 ve media. However\, FDTD does not extend seamlessly to higher orders. Fini
 te Volume Time Domain (FVTD) and Discontinuous Galerkin Time Domain (DGTD)
  schemes have been designed for CED and they do extend to higher orders. H
 owever\, versions of these methods that are in the literature do not simul
 taneously satisfy the global constraints\, and present a seamless path for
  the inclusion of PML and ADEs. Clearly\, a synthesis is needed where the 
 best aspects and versatility of FDTD are retained\, while rethinking from 
 the ground-up the best aspects of FVTD and DGTD schemes for CED.\n\nThe go
 al of this talk is to present recently innovated FVTD and DGTD schemes tha
 t are indeed the closest analogues of FDTD. In fact\, these novel methods 
 are built on the same foundation provided by the Yee-type mesh\; thereby r
 etaining many of the advantages of FDTD. However\, they also incorporate r
 ecent innovations. They represent a confluence of three leading-edge innov
 ations that have been pioneered by the author:- 1) The new methods use WEN
 O and DG reconstruction methods\, but only with a highly innovative recast
 ing of the reconstruction\, so as to satisfy Gauss’ laws (Balsara 2001\,
  2004\, 2009\, Balsara et al. 2017\, 2018). 2) The methods also utilize mu
 ltidimensional Riemann solvers so that the global constraints are satisfie
 d on the same control volume (Balsara 2010\, 2012\, 2014\, Balsara &amp; Dumbs
 er 2015\, Balsara et al. 2017\, 2018). 3) To treat stiff source terms\, PM
 L and ADEs we also recast the ADER methods (Dumbser et al. 2008\, 2013\, B
 alsara et al. 2009\, 2013\, Balsara et al. 2017\, 2018a\,b). A full von Ne
 umann stability analysis of multidimensional\, globally constraint-preserv
 ing DGTD schemes for CED is also presented (Balsara and Käppeli 2018) and
  it is shown that DGTD and PNPM schemes that result from our analysis have
  superior wave propagation properties as well as preservation of electroma
 gnetic energy at higher orders of accuracy. The PNPM schemes also offer th
 e advantage of large CFL number relative to DGTD schemes.\n\nAs the focus 
 in engineering and the sciences moves to uncertainty quantification\, mach
 ine learning and verification and validation of simulated data\, a new gen
 eration of high accuracy schemes is crucial to those broader goals. The pr
 oposed new techniques lay a firm foundation for the entire discipline of 2
 1st century CED\, leading to advances across multiple disciplines.\n\nCo-s
 ponsored by: Center for Computational Science and Engineering (CCSE)\, Uni
 versity of Toronto\n\nSpeaker(s): Prof. Dinshaw Balsara\, \n\nVirtual: htt
 ps://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/312555
LOCATION:Virtual: https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/312555
ORGANIZER:costas.sarris@utoronto.ca
SEQUENCE:10
SUMMARY:Higher Order Globally Constraint-Preserving FVTD and DGTD Schemes f
 or Time-Dependent Computational Electrodynamics (Prof. Dinshaw Balsara\, U
 . of Notre-Dame)
URL;VALUE=URI:https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/312555
X-ALT-DESC:Description: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;The numerical solution of Maxwell&amp;rsquo\;s
  time-dependent equations plays a very useful role in electrical engineeri
 ng\, physical chemistry and photonics at the nanoscale. Maxwell&amp;rsquo\;s e
 quations constitute an involution-constrained PDE system. The equations ca
 n be cast as a regular hyperbolic system of conservation laws and many inn
 ovations that have been developed in that area of study can be used to adv
 antage even for computational electrodynamics (CED). However\, the structu
 re of Maxwell&amp;rsquo\;s equations is inherently very different from that of
  other conservation laws\, with Faraday&amp;rsquo\;s and Ampere&amp;rsquo\;s laws 
 having a curl-type update. This curl-type update also ensures that Gauss&amp;r
 squo\; laws for charge and magnetic charge are naturally satisfied. The hi
 ghly popular and successful Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) scheme ca
 n mimetically fulfil the goals of global constraint preservation\, treatme
 nt of perfectly matched layer (PML) boundary conditions and inclusion of a
 uxiliary differential equations (ADEs) for dispersive media. However\, FDT
 D does not extend seamlessly to higher orders. Finite Volume Time Domain (
 FVTD) and Discontinuous Galerkin Time Domain (DGTD) schemes have been desi
 gned for CED and they do extend to higher orders. However\, versions of th
 ese methods that are in the literature do not simultaneously satisfy the g
 lobal constraints\, and present a seamless path for the inclusion of PML a
 nd ADEs. Clearly\, a synthesis is needed where the best aspects and versat
 ility of FDTD are retained\, while rethinking from the ground-up the best 
 aspects of FVTD and DGTD schemes for CED.&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nb
 sp\;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nbsp\; The goal of this tal
 k is to present recently innovated FVTD and DGTD schemes that are indeed t
 he closest analogues of FDTD. In fact\, these novel methods are built on t
 he same foundation provided by the Yee-type mesh\; thereby retaining many 
 of the advantages of FDTD. However\, they also incorporate recent innovati
 ons. They represent a confluence of three leading-edge innovations that ha
 ve been pioneered by the author:- &lt;strong&gt;1)&lt;/strong&gt; The new methods use 
 WENO and DG reconstruction methods\, but only with a highly innovative rec
 asting of the reconstruction\, so as to satisfy Gauss&amp;rsquo\; laws (Balsar
 a 2001\, 2004\, 2009\, Balsara &lt;em&gt;et al&lt;/em&gt;. 2017\, 2018). &lt;strong&gt;2)&lt;/s
 trong&gt; The methods also utilize multidimensional Riemann solvers so that t
 he global constraints are satisfied on the same control volume (Balsara 20
 10\, 2012\, 2014\, Balsara &amp;amp\; Dumbser 2015\, Balsara &lt;em&gt;et al&lt;/em&gt;. 2
 017\, 2018). &lt;strong&gt;3)&lt;/strong&gt; To treat stiff source terms\, PML and ADE
 s we also recast the ADER methods (Dumbser &lt;em&gt;et al&lt;/em&gt;. 2008\, 2013\, B
 alsara &lt;em&gt;et al&lt;/em&gt;. 2009\, 2013\, Balsara &lt;em&gt;et al&lt;/em&gt;. 2017\, 2018a\
 ,b). A full von Neumann stability analysis of multidimensional\, globally 
 constraint-preserving DGTD schemes for CED is also presented (Balsara and 
 K&amp;auml\;ppeli 2018) and it is shown that DGTD and PNPM schemes that result
  from our analysis have superior wave propagation properties as well as pr
 eservation of electromagnetic energy at higher orders of accuracy. The PNP
 M schemes also offer the advantage of large CFL number relative to DGTD sc
 hemes.&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nb
 sp\;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nbsp\; As the focus in engineering and the sciences moves to u
 ncertainty quantification\, machine learning and verification and validati
 on of simulated data\, a new generation of high accuracy schemes is crucia
 l to those broader goals. The proposed new techniques lay a firm foundatio
 n for the entire discipline of 21st century CED\, leading to advances acro
 ss multiple disciplines.&lt;/p&gt;
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

