BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:IEEE vTools.Events//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Los_Angeles
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20230312T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:PDT
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20231105T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:PST
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20230515T063122Z
UID:7A8C0217-D51C-486B-9B66-D61A1BB96846
DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20230508T180000
DTEND;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20230508T200000
DESCRIPTION:System-in-Package (SiP) technology provides a great opportunity
  for consumer electronics companies to make products with smaller form fac
 tor\, more functions\, and better reliability performance. One key reason 
 for SiP’s success is the encapsulated structure using molding compound\,
  which can provide protection to all the components inside and allows redu
 ced component-to-component spacing. However\, if the design or the manufac
 turing process have flaws\, failures can also happen inside of SiP\, and e
 ngineers have to spend much more efforts and time to conduct fault isolati
 on\, understand the root cause\, and make related corrective actions. In t
 his regard\, risks are borne not only by the SiP manufacturers\, but also 
 the system integrators and Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) who nee
 ds to assemble SiP into the final product. Therefore\, a comprehensive des
 ign and manufacturing assessment plan and an effective validation method a
 t an early stage of the SiP development will be extremely critical so that
  the risk can be identified in advance\, and the impact to the product lau
 nch can be minimized. This paper focuses on two types of encapsulant relat
 ed failures\, molding void and component internal delamination. By present
 ing several cases that are encountered during SiP development\, their fail
 ure mechanisms are studied\, and the methodology to detect the failure and
  assess the risk are also discussed.\n\nSpeaker(s): Dr Yuan Zhang\, \n\nBl
 dg: Mountain View Community Center\, 201S. Rengstorff Avenue\, mountain vi
 ew\, California\, United States\, 94040
LOCATION:Bldg: Mountain View Community Center\, 201S. Rengstorff Avenue\, m
 ountain view\, California\, United States\, 94040
ORGANIZER:ieeescvrelteam@googlegroups.com
SEQUENCE:2
SUMMARY:Validation and Risk Assessment Method for System-in-Package Design
URL;VALUE=URI:https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/360039
X-ALT-DESC:Description: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p data-key=&quot;77&quot;&gt;&lt;span data-key=&quot;78&quot;&gt;System-i
 n-Package (SiP) technology provides a great opportunity for consumer elect
 ronics companies to make products with smaller form factor\, more function
 s\, and better reliability performance. One key reason for SiP&amp;rsquo\;s su
 ccess is the encapsulated structure using molding compound\, which can pro
 vide protection to all the components inside and allows reduced component-
 to-component spacing. However\, if the design or the manufacturing process
  have flaws\, failures can also happen inside of SiP\, and engineers have 
 to spend much more efforts and time to conduct fault isolation\, understan
 d the root cause\, and make related corrective actions. In this regard\, r
 isks are borne not only by the SiP manufacturers\, but also the system int
 egrators and Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) who needs to assemble
  SiP into the final product. Therefore\, a comprehensive design and manufa
 cturing assessment plan and an effective validation method at an early sta
 ge of the SiP development will be extremely critical so that the risk can 
 be identified in advance\, and the impact to the product launch can be min
 imized. This paper focuses on two types of encapsulant related failures\, 
 molding void and component internal delamination. By presenting several ca
 ses that are encountered during SiP development\, their failure mechanisms
  are studied\, and the methodology to detect the failure and assess the ri
 sk are also discussed. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

