BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:IEEE vTools.Events//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Los_Angeles
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20230312T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:PDT
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20231105T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:PST
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20230704T165601Z
UID:30CA0108-9E33-4C5E-924E-6CA8DF14DFDA
DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20230630T140000
DTEND;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20230630T150000
DESCRIPTION:Recently\, the integration of inverter-based resources (IBRs) i
 n renewable energy systems has introduced new dynamic challenges to the po
 wer grid. These challenges include converter-driven oscillations and the e
 xpansion of power outage areas\, which pose a significant risk to the reli
 ability of future grids. Grid sensor technology has been developed\, enabl
 ing the collection of a vast amount of measurement data. This data present
 s an opportunity for machine-learning experts to leverage big data analyti
 cs and tackle various grid reliability analysis challenges specific to the
  future power system. However\, additional technical hurdles are related t
 o data integrity and consistency\, particularly regarding labeling and oth
 er factors. In power system analysis\, time-domain simulation models have 
 traditionally been used for contingency analysis\, post-mortem analysis\, 
 grid controller design\, and grid-wide protection. Synthetic data\, which 
 refers to simulated responses\, has emerged as a promising approach for im
 puting missing events and measurements in the data. However\, the validati
 on of simulation models\, especially for grid-wide events\, has been insuf
 ficient. This means that synthetic data from numerical simulation models a
 re accurate for limited power system dynamic studies but may not be adequa
 tely validated for broader applications. In addition\, there is a lack of 
 collaboration between modeling experts specializing in electromagnetic tra
 nsient modeling\, electromechanical modeling\, IBR modeling\, and grid mod
 eling. Furthermore\, no generally accepted model validation procedure or r
 equirements is in place. As a result\, well-validated model parameters for
  simulation studies are scarce\, even though the models themselves are rea
 dily available. Given these challenges\, machine-learning experts must per
 ceive the potential missing dynamics or model errors when utilizing synthe
 tic data for data-driven research studies. This presentation aims to addre
 ss the current quality of synthetic data and provide insights on navigatin
 g the complexities associated with big data in grid reliability analysis. 
 Join us for an engaging discussion on this topic.\n\nThis is a Virtual Pre
 sentation. You must register through the link provided under &quot;REGISTRATION
 &quot;. After registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing in
 formation about joining\n\nCo-sponsored by: University of California\, Riv
 erside\n\nVirtual: https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/364577
LOCATION:Virtual: https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/364577
ORGANIZER:mail@maxcherubin.com
SEQUENCE:13
SUMMARY:Grid modeling challenge for data-driven research studies
URL;VALUE=URI:https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/364577
X-ALT-DESC:Description: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Recently\, the integration of inverter-bas
 ed resources (IBRs) in renewable energy systems has introduced new dynamic
  challenges to the power grid. These challenges include converter-driven o
 scillations and the expansion of power outage areas\, which pose a signifi
 cant risk to the reliability of future grids. Grid sensor technology has b
 een developed\, enabling the collection of a vast amount of measurement da
 ta. This data presents an opportunity for machine-learning experts to leve
 rage big data analytics and tackle various grid reliability analysis chall
 enges specific to the future power system. However\, additional technical 
 hurdles are related to data integrity and consistency\, particularly regar
 ding labeling and other factors. In power system analysis\, time-domain si
 mulation models have traditionally been used for contingency analysis\, po
 st-mortem analysis\, grid controller design\, and grid-wide protection. Sy
 nthetic data\, which refers to simulated responses\, has emerged as a prom
 ising approach for imputing missing events and measurements in the data. H
 owever\, the validation of simulation models\, especially for grid-wide ev
 ents\, has been insufficient. This means that synthetic data from numerica
 l simulation models are accurate for limited power system dynamic studies 
 but may not be adequately validated for broader applications. In addition\
 , there is a lack of collaboration between modeling experts specializing i
 n electromagnetic transient modeling\, electromechanical modeling\, IBR mo
 deling\, and grid modeling. Furthermore\, no generally accepted model vali
 dation procedure or requirements is in place. As a result\, well-validated
  model parameters for simulation studies are scarce\, even though the mode
 ls themselves are readily available. Given these challenges\, machine-lear
 ning experts must perceive the potential missing dynamics or model errors 
 when utilizing synthetic data for data-driven research studies. This prese
 ntation aims to address the current quality of synthetic data and provide 
 insights on navigating the complexities associated with big data in grid r
 eliability analysis. Join us for an engaging discussion on this topic.&lt;/p&gt;
 \n&lt;p&gt;This is a Virtual Presentation. You must register through the link pr
 ovided under &quot;REGISTRATION&quot;. After registering\, you will receive a confir
 mation email containing information about joining&lt;/p&gt;
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

