BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:IEEE vTools.Events//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Los_Angeles
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20240310T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:PDT
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20241103T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:PST
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20240421T020552Z
UID:789ECFB9-5888-4802-9C87-50B454B02067
DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20240417T174500
DTEND;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20240417T194500
DESCRIPTION:Being fresh out of grad school (FOOGS) in 1988\, I reacted to P
 ID controllers in the usual way for young Ph.D. recipients: with a certain
  “hands-off” smugness. Yet\, as the years in industry wore on\, I kept
  encountering these ubiquitous devices in practice and had to learn to dea
 l with them\, understand them\, and roll my own. What I found led me to co
 nsider PIDs\, not as a separate art from advanced methods\, but as a funda
 mental building block which can be used as part of most controllers\, simp
 le or advanced. It seemed that – at least in the mechatronics world – 
 PIDs were considered too simple for much interest in academia while practi
 cing engineers didn’t seem to care why they were working. In the process
  world\, where PIDs studied far more\, the issues and methods of mechatron
 ic PIDs seemed like obscure corner cases. Depending upon the teaching text
 \, issues of sampling and digital representation may have been completely 
 omitted. There were other surprises. While PIDs were almost universal and 
 standard\, they were almost never unified or standardized. Furthermore\, w
 hat seemed to limit performance was not the structure of the controller it
 self\, but the lack of accurate system/process models based on repeated ph
 ysical system measurements. Finally\, the mechatronic and process PID goal
 s and foibles were not that different once one considered the different sy
 stem\, time constant\, and measurement constraints. We will discuss these 
 issues with the goal of getting a more unified view of PIDs across our app
 lication domains. We will provide a handful of common PID forms and show h
 ow they are related\, so that we can approach any PID structure with the s
 ame analytical approach. We will finally look forward to how PIDs can be u
 sed\, not only as a fundamental teaching tool for explaining control outsi
 de of our research circles\, but as a critical component for advanced cont
 rol methods. As the great Paul Simon might say\, “Mama don’t take my P
 ID away.”\n\nSpeaker(s): Dr. Danny Abramovitch \, \n\nAgenda: \n5:45 - 6
 :15 : Networking and light dinner\n\n6:15 - 7:15 : Talk and Q&amp;A\n\n7:15 - 
 7:45 : Networking\n\nRoom: SCDI - 2116\, Bldg: Sobrato Campus for Discover
 y and Innovation - SCDI\, 500 El Camino Real   \, Santa Clara \, Californi
 a\, United States\, 95053
LOCATION:Room: SCDI - 2116\, Bldg: Sobrato Campus for Discovery and Innovat
 ion - SCDI\, 500 El Camino Real   \, Santa Clara \, California\, United St
 ates\, 95053
ORGANIZER:mkhanbaghi@scu.edu
SEQUENCE:18
SUMMARY:Unintentional Expertise: How the Necessity of Working with PID Cont
 rollers Across Multiple Domains Fundamentally Improved My Understanding of
  Control Theory and Practice
URL;VALUE=URI:https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/415806
X-ALT-DESC:Description: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; style=&quot;text-align: justi
 fy\; tab-stops: 0in\;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 12pt\; font-family: arial\,
  helvetica\, sans-serif\;&quot;&gt;Being fresh out of grad school (FOOGS) in 1988\
 , I reacted to PID controllers in the usual way for young Ph.D. recipients
 : with a certain &amp;ldquo\;hands-off&amp;rdquo\; smugness.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-space
 run: yes\;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp\; &lt;/span&gt;Yet\, as the years in industry wore on\, I kept
  encountering these ubiquitous devices in practice and had to learn to dea
 l with them\, understand them\, and roll my own.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun:
  yes\;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp\; &lt;/span&gt;What I found led me to consider PIDs\, not as a sep
 arate art from advanced methods\, but as a fundamental building block whic
 h can be used as part of most controllers\, simple or advanced.&lt;span style
 =&quot;mso-spacerun: yes\;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp\; &lt;/span&gt;It seemed that &amp;ndash\; at least in 
 the mechatronics world &amp;ndash\; PIDs were considered too simple for much i
 nterest in academia while practicing engineers didn&amp;rsquo\;t seem to care 
 why they were working.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes\;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp\; &lt;/span&gt;In 
 the process world\, where PIDs studied far more\, the issues and methods o
 f mechatronic PIDs seemed like obscure corner cases.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-space
 run: yes\;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp\; &lt;/span&gt;Depending upon the teaching text\, issues of sa
 mpling and digital representation may have been completely omitted.&lt;span s
 tyle=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes\;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp\; &lt;/span&gt;There were other surprises.&lt;span
  style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes\;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp\; &lt;/span&gt;While PIDs were almost univers
 al and standard\, they were almost never unified or standardized.&lt;span sty
 le=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes\;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp\;&lt;/span&gt;Furthermore\, what seemed to limit 
 performance was not the structure of the controller itself\, but the lack 
 of accurate system/process models based on repeated physical system measur
 ements. Finally\, the mechatronic and process PID goals and foibles were n
 ot that different once one considered the different system\, time constant
 \, and measurement constraints.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes\;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp\; &lt;
 /span&gt;We will discuss these issues with the goal of getting a more unified
  view of PIDs across our application domains. We will provide a handful of
  common PID forms and show how they are related\, so that we can approach 
 any PID structure with the same analytical approach. We will finally look 
 forward to how PIDs can be used\, not only as a fundamental teaching tool 
 for explaining control outside of our research circles\, but as a critical
  component for advanced control methods.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes\;&quot;&gt;
 &amp;nbsp\; &lt;/span&gt;As the great Paul Simon might say\, &amp;ldquo\;Mama don&amp;rsquo\
 ;t take my PID away.&amp;rdquo\;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; style=&quot;text-
 align: justify\; tab-stops: 0in\;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 10.0pt\;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp
 \;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; style=&quot;text-align: justify\; tab-stops
 : 0in\;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 10.0pt\;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp\;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A
 genda: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;5:45 - 6:15 : Networking and light dinner&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p&gt;6:15 - 7
 :15 : Talk and Q&amp;amp\;A&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p&gt;7:15 - 7:45 : Networking&lt;/p&gt;
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

