BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:IEEE vTools.Events//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Asia/Kolkata
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:19451014T230000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0630
TZOFFSETTO:+0530
TZNAME:IST
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20241017T042954Z
UID:82412BDD-C6EE-47DD-ACB4-7FF9C236F542
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20240923T150000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20240923T165600
DESCRIPTION:Objective:The objective of the debate competition was to foster
  discussion among students about the implications and challenges of NEP 20
 20. Specific areas of focus included funding for innovation\, the benefits
  and drawbacks of online teaching\, and the role of traditional teaching m
 ethods in modern education.\n\nBrief About the Event: The debate was organ
 ized by the Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) and Zenith Forum at GHR
 CE. The participants were divided into teams to discuss various aspects of
  NEP 2020\, covering topics such as &quot;Funds for Innovation\,&quot; &quot;Online Teach
 ing vs. Traditional Teaching\,&quot; and other related subtopics. The event all
 owed students to present their views\, engage in healthy discussions\, and
  consider different perspectives on how the new education policy could imp
 act learning environments\, teaching methods\, and innovation in education
 .\n\nIn the competition\, Tanushree Tharuk from AIML was declared the winn
 er while Parth Deshmukh from Electronics Engineering was the runner-up.\n\
 nAgenda: \nDebate\n\nCRPF GATE NO 3 HINGNA ROAD NAGPUR\, NAGPUR\, Maharash
 tra\, India\, 440016
LOCATION:CRPF GATE NO 3 HINGNA ROAD NAGPUR\, NAGPUR\, Maharashtra\, India\,
  440016
ORGANIZER:laxman.thakare@raisoni.net
SEQUENCE:6
SUMMARY:Debate on National Education Policy (NEP) 2020
URL;VALUE=URI:https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/440628
X-ALT-DESC:Description: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;mso-element: frame\; mso-element-
 frame-hspace: 9.0pt\; mso-element-wrap: around\; mso-element-anchor-vertic
 al: paragraph\; mso-element-anchor-horizontal: column\; mso-element-left: 
 center\; mso-element-top: .05pt\; mso-height-rule: exactly\;&quot;&gt;\n&lt;table cel
 lspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;\n&lt;tbody&gt;\n&lt;tr&gt;\n&lt;td style=&quot;pa
 dding: 0cm 9.0pt 0cm 9.0pt\;&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;\n&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNor
 mal&quot; style=&quot;text-align: justify\; text-justify: inter-ideograph\; mso-elem
 ent: frame\; mso-element-frame-hspace: 9.0pt\; mso-element-wrap: around\; 
 mso-element-anchor-vertical: paragraph\; mso-element-anchor-horizontal: co
 lumn\; mso-element-left: center\; mso-element-top: .05pt\; mso-height-rule
 : exactly\;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong style=&quot;mso-bidi-font-weight: normal\;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;f
 ont-size: 11.0pt\;&quot;&gt;Objective:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 12.0
 pt\;&quot;&gt;The objective of the debate competition was to foster discussion amo
 ng students about the implications and challenges of NEP 2020. Specific ar
 eas of focus included funding for innovation\, the benefits and drawbacks 
 of online teaching\, and the role of traditional teaching methods in moder
 n education.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; style=&quot;text-align: justify\;
  text-justify: inter-ideograph\; mso-element: frame\; mso-element-frame-hs
 pace: 9.0pt\; mso-element-wrap: around\; mso-element-anchor-vertical: para
 graph\; mso-element-anchor-horizontal: column\; mso-element-left: center\;
  mso-element-top: .05pt\; mso-height-rule: exactly\;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong style=&quot;mso-b
 idi-font-weight: normal\;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 11.0pt\;&quot;&gt;Brief About t
 he Event: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 12.0pt\;&quot;&gt;The debate was
  organized by the Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) and Zenith Forum 
 at GHRCE. The participants were divided into teams to discuss various aspe
 cts of NEP 2020\, covering topics such as &quot;Funds for Innovation\,&quot; &quot;Online
  Teaching vs. Traditional Teaching\,&quot; and other related subtopics. The eve
 nt allowed students to present their views\, engage in healthy discussions
 \, and consider different perspectives on how the new education policy cou
 ld impact learning environments\, teaching methods\, and innovation in edu
 cation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; style=&quot;text-align: justify\; text
 -justify: inter-ideograph\; mso-element: frame\; mso-element-frame-hspace:
  9.0pt\; mso-element-wrap: around\; mso-element-anchor-vertical: paragraph
 \; mso-element-anchor-horizontal: column\; mso-element-left: center\; mso-
 element-top: .05pt\; mso-height-rule: exactly\;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 1
 2.0pt\;&quot;&gt;In the competition\, Tanushree Tharuk from AIML was declared the 
 winner while Parth Deshmukh from Electronics Engineering was the runner-up
 .&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;/td&gt;\n&lt;/tr&gt;\n&lt;/tbody&gt;\n&lt;/table&gt;\n&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Agenda: 
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Debate&lt;/p&gt;
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

