BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:IEEE vTools.Events//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20250309T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:EDT
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20241103T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:EST
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20250215T202920Z
UID:57237E37-DE27-46E9-970E-E094FF85CAB7
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20250212T140000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20250212T150000
DESCRIPTION:Speaker: Professor Ender Ayanoglu\, University of California\, 
 Irvine\, CA\,\nAbstract: Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) implement 
 Machine Learning (ML) algorithms that have the ability to address competit
 ive resource allocation problems together with detection and mitigation of
  anomalous behavior. In this talk\, we discuss their use in next-generatio
 n (NextG) communications within the context of cognitive networks to addre
 ss i) spectrum sharing\, ii) detecting anomalies\, and iii) mitigating sec
 urity attacks. GANs have the following advantages. First\, they can learn 
 and synthesize field data\, which can be costly\, time consuming\, and non
 repeatable. Second\, they enable pre-training classifiers by using semi-su
 pervised data. Third\, they facilitate increased resolution. Fourth\, they
  enable recovering corrupted bits in the spectrum. The talk will provide b
 asics of GANs\, a comparative discussion on different kinds of GANs\, perf
 ormance measures for GANs in computer vision and image processing as well 
 as wireless applications\, a number of datasets for wireless applications\
 , performance measures for general classifiers\, a survey of the literatur
 e on GANs for i)–iii) above\, some simulation results\, and future resea
 rch directions. In the spectrum sharing problem\, connections to cognitive
  wireless networks are established. Simulation results show that a particu
 lar GAN implementation is better than a convolutional autoencoder for an o
 utlier detection problem in spectrum sensing.\n\nCo-sponsored by: IEEE PCJ
 S\n\nSpeaker(s): Ender Ayanoglu\, \n\nVirtual: https://events.vtools.ieee.
 org/m/463498
LOCATION:Virtual: https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/463498
ORGANIZER:dkinnovate77@gmail.com
SEQUENCE:14
SUMMARY:Machine Learning in NextG Networks via Generative Adversarial Netwo
 rks
URL;VALUE=URI:https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/463498
X-ALT-DESC:Description: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Speaker:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp\;Professo
 r Ender Ayanoglu\,&amp;nbsp\;University of California\, Irvine\, CA\,&lt;/div&gt;\n&lt;
 div&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract: &lt;/strong&gt;Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) impl
 ement Machine Learning (ML) algorithms that have the ability to address co
 mpetitive resource allocation problems together with detection and mitigat
 ion of anomalous behavior. In this talk\, we discuss their use in next-gen
 eration (NextG) communications within the context of cognitive networks to
  address i) spectrum sharing\, ii) detecting anomalies\, and iii) mitigati
 ng security attacks. GANs have the following advantages. First\, they can 
 learn and synthesize field data\, which can be costly\, time consuming\, a
 nd nonrepeatable. Second\, they enable pre-training classifiers by using s
 emi-supervised data. Third\, they facilitate increased resolution. Fourth\
 , they enable recovering corrupted bits in the spectrum. The talk will pro
 vide basics of GANs\, a comparative discussion on different kinds of GANs\
 , performance measures for GANs in computer vision and image processing as
  well as wireless applications\, a number of datasets for wireless applica
 tions\, performance measures for general classifiers\, a survey of the lit
 erature on GANs for i)&amp;ndash\;iii) above\, some simulation results\, and f
 uture research directions. In the spectrum sharing problem\, connections t
 o cognitive wireless networks are established. Simulation results show tha
 t a particular GAN implementation is better than a convolutional autoencod
 er for an outlier detection problem in spectrum sensing.&lt;/div&gt;\n&lt;div&gt;&amp;nbsp
 \;&lt;/div&gt;\n&lt;div&gt;&amp;nbsp\;&lt;/div&gt;
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

