BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:IEEE vTools.Events//EN CALSCALE:GREGORIAN BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:US/Eastern BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:20180311T030000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3 TZNAME:EDT END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:20171105T010000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 TZNAME:EST END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20171122T204719Z UID:54E34431-CFC6-11E7-A02F-0050568D7F66 DTSTART;TZID=US/Eastern:20171218T170000 DTEND;TZID=US/Eastern:20171218T190000 DESCRIPTION:The issue of Network Neutrality has ignited considerable public debate recently. While the term and much of the discussion originated in the legal community\, we started looking at it from an engineering and net working perspective a few years ago. We employed the lens of cooperative g ame theory and a careful modeling of the Internet including the topology\, peering relationships and protocols used on the Internet. Our primary con clusion is that Network Neutrality should be expressed in terms of how you treat competition\, not in how you treat packets and we proposed a defini tion of Network Neutrality that expresses that. We present some of our res ults including our prediction back in 2008 of a rise in paid peering\, (la st year Netflix signed paid peering arrangements with all four of the top broadband providers in the US)\, the inadequacies of the Network Neutralit y regulation in the US and the recent regulations in India and Canada\, wh ere they are are consistent with our definition of Network Neutrality.\n\n Speaker(s): Vishal Misra\, \, Vishal Misra\, \n\nRoom: The Annex\, 4 Irvin g Place\, New York\, New York\, United States\, 10003 LOCATION:Room: The Annex\, 4 Irving Place\, New York\, New York\, United St ates\, 10003 ORGANIZER:wongar@coned.com SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Net Neutrality URL;VALUE=URI:https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/48678 X-ALT-DESC:Description: <br /><p>The issue of Network Neutrality has ignite d considerable public debate&nbsp\;recently. While the term and much of th e discussion originated in the&nbsp\;legal community\, we started looking at it from an engineering and&nbsp\;networking perspective a few years ago . We employed the lens of&nbsp\;cooperative game theory and a careful mode ling of the Internet&nbsp\;including the topology\, peering relationships and protocols used on&nbsp\;the Internet. Our primary conclusion is that N etwork Neutrality should be expressed in terms of how you treat competitio n\, not in how you treat packets and we proposed a definition of Network N eutrality that expresses that. We present some of our results including ou r prediction back in 2008 of a rise in paid &nbsp\;peering\, (last year Ne tflix signed paid peering arrangements with all four&nbsp\;of the top broa dband providers in the US)\, the inadequacies of the &nbsp\;Network Neutra lity regulation in the US and the recent regulations in India and Canada\, where they are are consistent with our definition of Network Neutrality.& nbsp\;</p> END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR