BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:IEEE vTools.Events//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Los_Angeles
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20260308T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:PDT
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20261101T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:PST
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260413T182041Z
UID:6B90B397-3B4C-41FD-96FD-CDDFAC16E165
DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20260408T173000
DTEND;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20260408T191500
DESCRIPTION:High Voltage DC Transmission has seen rapid technology advances
  in the last 20 years driven by the implementation of VSC (Voltage Source 
 Converters) at GW powers and in particular introduction of MMC (Modular Mu
 ltilevel Converters). The development of interconnected DC transmission gr
 ids requires significant further advance from the existing point-to-point 
 HVDC links. It is widely believed that complex DC power grids can be built
  with comparable performance\, reliability\, flexibility and losses as tra
 ditional AC grids. The primary motivation for DC grid development is the n
 eed for power flow and trading between many DC terminals\, as an example i
 n the proposed (350 GW) North Sea DC grid\, or EU-wide overlay DC grid. AC
  transmission is not feasible with long subsea cables\, and it is inferior
  to DC systems in many other conditions. This presentation addresses the o
 ptions and challenges with DC grid development\, referring also to state-o
 f-art technology status.\n\nZhangbei 4-terminal DC system (China\, 2020) r
 epresents the first implemented GW-scale meshed DC transmission grid\, whi
 ch employs bipolar ring topology with overhead lines and 16 DC Circuit Bre
 akers. However\, multiple studies illustrate advantages of some radial\, h
 ub-based or segmented topologies\, because of component costs\, and challe
 nges with interoperability\, ownership\, DC markets\, operation\, security
  and reliability.\n\nMMC concepts\, including half-bridge and full-bridge 
 modules\, will underpin DC grid converters and further advances like hybri
 d LCC/MMC converters have been implemented recently. DC/DC converters at h
 undreds of MW are not yet commercially available but there is lot of resea
 rch world-wide\, and some lower-power prototypes have been demonstrated. D
 C/DC converters may take multiple functions including: DC voltage stepping
  (transformer role)\, DC fault interruption (DC CB role) and power flow co
 ntrol. Multiport DC hubs can be viewed as electronic DC substations\, capa
 ble of interconnecting multiple DC lines.\n\nVery fast DC CB circuit break
 ers (2 ms) have become commercially available recently\, but the cost is c
 onsiderably higher than AC CBs. Slightly slower mechanical DC CBs (5-8 ms)
  are also available from multiple vendors\, while new technical solutions 
 are emerging worldwide for achieving faster operation with lower size/weig
 ht/costs.\n\nDC grid modelling will face the new challenge of numerous con
 verters dynamically coupled through low-impedance DC cables/lines. A compr
 omise between simulation speed and accuracy is required\, leading to some 
 average-value modelling\, commonly in rotating DQ frame\, but capturing ve
 ry fast dynamics and variable structure to represent fault conditions.\n\n
 The principles of control of DC grids have been developed. DC systems have
  no system-wide common frequency to indicate power unbalance\, and voltage
  responds to local and global loading rather than reactive power flow. DC 
 grid dynamics are 2 orders of magnitude faster than traditional AC systems
  and most components will be controllable implying numerous\, fast control
  loop interactions. Because of lack of inertia\, and minimal overload capa
 bility for semiconductors\, DC grid primary and secondary control should b
 e feedback-based (man-made)\, fast\, and distributed. International standa
 rdization efforts have begun.\n\nThe protection of DC grids is a significa
 nt technical challenge\, both in terms of components and protection logic.
  The selectivity has been demonstrated within 0.5 ms timeframe using comme
 rcial and open-source DC relays. Nevertheless\, grid operators have expres
 sed concerns with self-protection on various components\, back-up grid-wid
 e protection\, interoperability\, and in general if we can achieve power t
 ransfer security levels comparable with AC grids and acceptable to stakeho
 lders.\n\nSpeaker(s): Dragan Jovcic\, \n\nAgenda: \n• 5:30 – 5:45 PM: 
 Welcome &amp; Introduction\n• 5:45 – 6:45 PM: Distinguished Lecturer Techn
 ical Talk\n• 6:45 – 7:15 PM: Q&amp;A Session\n• 7:15 – 7:30 PM: Closin
 g Remarks &amp; Acknowledgements\n\n1825 Schweitzer Drive\, Pullman\, Washingt
 on\, United States\, 99163\, Virtual: https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/534
 274
LOCATION:1825 Schweitzer Drive\, Pullman\, Washington\, United States\, 991
 63\, Virtual: https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/534274
ORGANIZER:pavan_penkey@ieee.org
SEQUENCE:19
SUMMARY:DC Transmission Grids - Topology\, Components\, Modelling\, Control
  and Protection Challenges
URL;VALUE=URI:https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/534274
X-ALT-DESC:Description: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoBodyText&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size
 : 9.0pt\;&quot;&gt;High Voltage DC Transmission has seen rapid technology advances
  in the last 20 years driven by the implementation of VSC (Voltage Source 
 Converters) at GW powers and in particular introduction of MMC (Modular Mu
 ltilevel Converters). The development of interconnected DC transmission gr
 ids requires significant further advance from the existing point-to-point 
 HVDC links. It is widely believed that complex DC power grids can be built
  with comparable performance\, reliability\, flexibility and losses as tra
 ditional AC grids. The primary motivation for DC grid development is the n
 eed for power flow and trading between many DC terminals\, as an example i
 n the proposed (350 GW) North Sea DC grid\, or EU-wide overlay DC grid. AC
  transmission is not feasible with long subsea cables\, and it is inferior
  to DC systems in many other conditions. This presentation addresses the o
 ptions and challenges with DC grid development\, referring also to state-o
 f-art technology status. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p class=&quot;MsoBodyText&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;
 font-size: 9.0pt\;&quot;&gt;Zhangbei 4-terminal DC system (China\, 2020) represent
 s the first implemented GW-scale meshed DC transmission grid\, which emplo
 ys bipolar ring topology with overhead lines and 16 DC Circuit Breakers. H
 owever\, multiple studies illustrate advantages of some radial\, hub-based
  or segmented topologies\, because of component costs\, and challenges wit
 h interoperability\, ownership\, DC markets\, operation\, security and rel
 iability.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes\;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nbsp\;&amp;nbsp\; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/
 span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p class=&quot;MsoBodyText&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 9.0pt\;&quot;&gt;MMC con
 cepts\, including half-bridge and full-bridge modules\, will underpin DC g
 rid converters and further advances like hybrid LCC/MMC converters have be
 en implemented recently. DC/DC converters at hundreds of MW are not yet co
 mmercially available but there is lot of research world-wide\, and some lo
 wer-power prototypes have been demonstrated. DC/DC converters may take mul
 tiple functions including: DC voltage stepping (transformer role)\, DC fau
 lt interruption (DC CB role) and power flow control. Multiport DC hubs can
  be viewed as electronic DC substations\, capable of interconnecting multi
 ple DC lines. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p class=&quot;MsoBodyText&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 
 9.0pt\;&quot;&gt;Very fast DC CB circuit breakers (2 ms) have become commercially 
 available recently\, but the cost is considerably higher than AC CBs. Slig
 htly slower mechanical DC CBs (5-8 ms) are also available from multiple ve
 ndors\, while new technical solutions are emerging worldwide for achieving
  faster operation with lower size/weight/costs.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: 
 yes\;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp\; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p class=&quot;MsoBodyText&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;fon
 t-size: 9.0pt\;&quot;&gt;DC grid modelling will face the new challenge of numerous
  converters dynamically coupled through low-impedance DC cables/lines. A c
 ompromise between simulation speed and accuracy is required\, leading to s
 ome average-value modelling\, commonly in rotating DQ frame\, but capturin
 g very fast dynamics and variable structure to represent fault conditions.
  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p class=&quot;MsoBodyText&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 9.0pt\;&quot;&gt;The 
 principles of control of DC grids have been developed. DC systems have no 
 system-wide common frequency to indicate power unbalance\, and voltage res
 ponds to local and global loading rather than reactive power flow. DC grid
  dynamics are 2 orders of magnitude faster than traditional AC systems and
  most components will be controllable implying numerous\, fast control loo
 p interactions. Because of lack of inertia\, and minimal overload capabili
 ty for semiconductors\, DC grid primary and secondary control should be fe
 edback-based (man-made)\, fast\, and distributed. International standardiz
 ation efforts have begun. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p class=&quot;MsoBodyText&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=
 &quot;font-size: 9.0pt\;&quot;&gt;The protection of DC grids is a significant technical
  challenge\, both in terms of components and protection logic. The selecti
 vity has been demonstrated within 0.5 ms timeframe using commercial and op
 en-source DC relays. Nevertheless\, grid operators have expressed concerns
  with self-protection on various components\, back-up grid-wide protection
 \, interoperability\, and in general if we can achieve power transfer secu
 rity levels comparable with AC grids and acceptable to stakeholders.&lt;/span
 &gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Agenda: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span data-teams=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&amp;bull\; 5:30 &amp;nd
 ash\; 5:45 PM: Welcome &amp;amp\; Introduction&lt;br&gt;&amp;bull\; 5:45 &amp;ndash\; 6:45 P
 M: Distinguished Lecturer Technical Talk&lt;br&gt;&amp;bull\; 6:45 &amp;ndash\; 7:15 PM:
  Q&amp;amp\;A Session&lt;br&gt;&amp;bull\; 7:15 &amp;ndash\; 7:30 PM: Closing Remarks &amp;amp\;
  Acknowledgements&lt;br&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp\;&lt;/p&gt;
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

