BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:IEEE vTools.Events//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20260308T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:EDT
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20261101T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:EST
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260713T151837Z
UID:FFBCA96C-5E5E-4DC7-B90F-984D69B6FD29
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260813T113000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260813T130000
DESCRIPTION:Modern radar systems are becoming increasingly sophisticated an
 d responsive to their environments. While this flexibility enhances perfor
 mance\, it also introduces a fundamental vulnerability: behavioral adaptat
 ion becomes observable. An adversary can exploit radar emissions\, respons
 es\, and operational patterns to infer hidden states\, tracking strategies
 \, and intent. This talk presents a unifying perspective on radar interact
 ion as an adversarial inference problem\, grounded in statistical signal p
 rocessing and inverse reinforcement learning. Instead of estimating a targ
 et\, we shift the focus to inferring an adversarial radar\, using inverse 
 filtering and natural language processing techniques to reconstruct the ra
 dar&#39;s estimate of the target\, its hidden beliefs\, and its operational in
 tent. We then address a fundamental question: how can one detect the prese
 nce of a cognitive radar and identify its underlying objectives? This moti
 vates revealed preference theory from microeconomics and inverse reinforce
 ment learning as principled tools for inferring radar intent from observed
  behavior. Finally\, we reverse the perspective: how can a radar mask its 
 sensing strategy from an adversary while preserving operational effectiven
 ess? We discuss mechanisms including utility masking and information-theor
 etic approaches that degrade identifiability while preserving performance.
 \n\nSpeaker(s): \, Vikram Krishnamurthy\n\nRoom: McFawn Room\, Mile 2 Miss
 ion Delivery Center\, 5000 Springfield Street\, Dayton\, Ohio\, United Sta
 tes\, 45431
LOCATION:Room: McFawn Room\, Mile 2 Mission Delivery Center\, 5000 Springfi
 eld Street\, Dayton\, Ohio\, United States\, 45431
ORGANIZER:michael.callahan.10@us.af.mil
SEQUENCE:9
SUMMARY:Adversarial Radars: Inference\, Intent\, and Plan Masking
URL;VALUE=URI:https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/567761
X-ALT-DESC:Description: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Modern radar systems are becoming increasi
 ngly sophisticated and responsive to their environments. While this flexib
 ility enhances performance\, it also introduces a fundamental vulnerabilit
 y: behavioral adaptation becomes observable. An adversary can exploit rada
 r emissions\, responses\, and operational patterns to infer hidden states\
 , tracking strategies\, and intent. This talk presents a unifying perspect
 ive on radar interaction as an adversarial inference problem\, grounded in
  statistical signal processing and inverse reinforcement learning. Instead
  of estimating a target\, we shift the focus to inferring an adversarial r
 adar\, using inverse filtering and natural language processing techniques 
 to reconstruct the radar&#39;s estimate of the target\, its hidden beliefs\, a
 nd its operational intent. We then address a fundamental question: how can
  one detect the presence of a cognitive radar and identify its underlying 
 objectives? This motivates revealed preference theory from microeconomics 
 and inverse reinforcement learning as principled tools for inferring radar
  intent from observed behavior. Finally\, we reverse the perspective: how 
 can a radar mask its sensing strategy from an adversary while preserving o
 perational effectiveness? We discuss mechanisms including utility masking 
 and information-theoretic approaches that degrade identifiability while pr
 eserving performance.&lt;/p&gt;
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

