BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:IEEE vTools.Events//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Chicago
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20260308T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:CDT
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20261101T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:CST
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260805T155005Z
UID:237E1C06-F1B6-49A9-BD08-7D8B204A31E8
DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20260921T193000
DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20260921T210000
DESCRIPTION:Abstract:\n\nHow Identity\, Enterprise Context\, Observability\
 , and Bounded Authority Shape Live Risk Decisions\n\nAn aircraft may begin
  its journey with a verified pilot\, an approved flight plan\, and permiss
 ion to take off. But that approval does not guarantee that the original ro
 ute will remain safe for the entire flight. Weather\, traffic\, fuel\, air
 port availability\, and other conditions can change. Air traffic control u
 ses live signals to decide whether the aircraft should continue\, slow dow
 n\, hold\, change its route\, divert\, or land.\n\nAI agents face a simila
 r challenge. An agent may authenticate\, receive permissions\, access appr
 oved tools\, and begin a task correctly. But as it works\, its behavior\, 
 enterprise context\, risk\, cost\, data sensitivity\, and operating condit
 ions can change. A permission that was appropriate at the start of the ses
 sion may not be enough to safely approve every action that follows.\n\nThi
 s talk explains how organizations can build a runtime posture for AI agent
 s. Runtime posture brings together signals such as agent identity\, the us
 er it represents\, session state\, business purpose\, enterprise context\,
  tool usage\, data sensitivity\, behavior\, approvals\, risk\, and cost.\n
 \nObservability provides live information about what the agent is doing. E
 nterprise context explains the business meaning\, relationships\, ownershi
 p\, dependencies\, policies\, and current conditions around an action. Bou
 nded authority defines the limits within which the agent may operate\, inc
 luding its allowed tools\, data\, purpose\, time\, risk\, and cost.\n\nUsi
 ng a practical enterprise scenario and the air traffic control analogy\, t
 he session will show how these signals can be evaluated at important decis
 ion points. Based on the agent’s current posture\, the governing system 
 can allow an action\, apply additional limits\, request human approval\, r
 edirect the agent to a safer option\, or block the action.\n\nThe key mess
 age is simple: initial authorization starts the journey\, but runtime post
 ure determines whether the next action is still safe.\n\nVirtual: https://
 events.vtools.ieee.org/m/571392
LOCATION:Virtual: https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/571392
ORGANIZER:wluo@stmarytx.edu
SEQUENCE:9
SUMMARY:From Signals to Decisions: Building Runtime Posture for AI Agents
URL;VALUE=URI:https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/571392
X-ALT-DESC:Description: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong
  data-olk-copy-source=&quot;MessageBody&quot;&gt;How Identity\, Enterprise Context\, Ob
 servability\, and Bounded Authority Shape Live Risk Decisions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 \n&lt;p&gt;An aircraft may begin its journey with a verified pilot\, an approved
  flight plan\, and permission to take off. But that approval does not guar
 antee that the original route will remain safe for the entire flight. Weat
 her\, traffic\, fuel\, airport availability\, and other conditions can cha
 nge. Air traffic control uses live signals to decide whether the aircraft 
 should continue\, slow down\, hold\, change its route\, divert\, or land.&lt;
 /p&gt;\n&lt;p&gt;AI agents face a similar challenge. An agent may authenticate\, re
 ceive permissions\, access approved tools\, and begin a task correctly. Bu
 t as it works\, its behavior\, enterprise context\, risk\, cost\, data sen
 sitivity\, and operating conditions can change. A permission that was appr
 opriate at the start of the session may not be enough to safely approve ev
 ery action that follows.&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p&gt;This talk explains how organizations can 
 build a runtime posture for AI agents. Runtime posture brings together sig
 nals such as agent identity\, the user it represents\, session state\, bus
 iness purpose\, enterprise context\, tool usage\, data sensitivity\, behav
 ior\, approvals\, risk\, and cost.&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p&gt;Observability provides live inf
 ormation about what the agent is doing. Enterprise context explains the bu
 siness meaning\, relationships\, ownership\, dependencies\, policies\, and
  current conditions around an action. Bounded authority defines the limits
  within which the agent may operate\, including its allowed tools\, data\,
  purpose\, time\, risk\, and cost.&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p&gt;Using a practical enterprise sc
 enario and the air traffic control analogy\, the session will show how the
 se signals can be evaluated at important decision points. Based on the age
 nt&amp;rsquo\;s current posture\, the governing system can allow an action\, a
 pply additional limits\, request human approval\, redirect the agent to a 
 safer option\, or block the action.&lt;/p&gt;\n&lt;p&gt;The key message is simple: ini
 tial authorization starts the journey\, but runtime posture determines whe
 ther the next action is still safe.&lt;/p&gt;
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

