BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:IEEE vTools.Events//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20260308T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:EDT
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20261101T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:EST
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261021T133715Z
UID:481736EA-03DD-4A09-9329-D370B57A4BC0
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20261020T190000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20261020T200000
DESCRIPTION:Over the last two decades there has been significant progress i
 n autonomous systems developments and AI applications in aerospace. Howeve
 r\, these systems\, including learning components\, must have formal assur
 ance of their behavior before they can be safely deployed in the real-worl
 d. Our research provides an assurance framework for learning-enabled syste
 ms as a foundation for physical AI for flight. A typical architecture in t
 hese systems involves layers for perception\, planning and control\, where
 in each of these layers uses different tools and metrics for assessing rob
 ustness and performance. For example\, the planners -- that use vision-bas
 ed sensors to update the navigation and motion planning -- operate largely
  relying on distributionally robust stochastic optimal control\, whereas t
 he low-level controller can be a deterministic controller with its convent
 ional gain and phase (time-delay) margin. We present a new analysis framew
 ork for addressing this ontology challenge inherent to autonomous systems.
  We derive distributional robustness guarantees for deterministic L1 adapt
 ive controllers that can be used by any stochastic planner without facing 
 a language barrier. The combined planner-controller framework can serve as
  foundation for development of certificates for V&amp;V of learning-enabled sy
 stems and -- with that -- ensure a rigorous physical AI development for fl
 ight. An overview of different projects at our lab that build upon this fr
 amework will be demonstrated to show different applications. In particular
 \, the presentation will cover the flight tests of AirSTAR from NASA’s 2
 007-2010 Aviation Safety program\, Learjet flights from Edwards AFB from 2
 015-2018\, including a brief episode of Lockheed Martin’s VISTA X-62 fli
 ght test achieving TRL-6 in 3g flight condition\, and many others.\n\nSpea
 ker(s): Dr. Hovakimyan\, \n\nVirtual: https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/575
 664
LOCATION:Virtual: https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/575664
ORGANIZER:joseph.palko@ieee.org
SEQUENCE:60
SUMMARY:L1 ADAPTIVE CONTROL AND ITS TRANSITION TO PRACTICE
URL;VALUE=URI:https://events.vtools.ieee.org/m/575664
X-ALT-DESC:Description: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;IT&quot; style=&quot;font-size: 10.0pt\;
  font-family: &#39;Aptos&#39;\,sans-serif\; mso-ascii-theme-font: minor-latin\; ms
 o-fareast-font-family: Aptos\; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin\; mso-h
 ansi-theme-font: minor-latin\; mso-bidi-font-family: &#39;Times New Roman&#39;\; m
 so-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi\; mso-ansi-language: IT\; mso-fareast-langu
 age: EN-US\; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA\;&quot;&gt;Over the last two decades there h
 as been significant progress in autonomous systems developments and AI app
 lications in aerospace.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes\;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp\; &lt;/span&gt;Ho
 wever\, these systems\, including learning components\, must have formal a
 ssurance of their behavior before they can be safely deployed in the real-
 world.&lt;span style=&quot;mso-spacerun: yes\;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp\; &lt;/span&gt;Our research provid
 es an assurance framework for learning-enabled systems as a foundation for
  physical AI for flight.&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;A typical architecture in these 
 systems involves layers for perception\, planning and control\, wherein ea
 ch of these layers uses different tools and metrics for assessing robustne
 ss and performance. For example\, the planners -- that use vision-based se
 nsors to update the navigation and motion planning -- operate largely rely
 ing on distributionally robust stochastic optimal control\, whereas the lo
 w-level controller can be a deterministic controller with its conventional
  gain and phase (time-delay) margin. We present a new analysis framework f
 or addressing this ontology challenge inherent to autonomous systems. We d
 erive distributional robustness guarantees for deterministic L1 adaptive c
 ontrollers that can be used by any stochastic planner without facing a lan
 guage barrier. The combined planner-controller framework can serve as foun
 dation for &lt;span style=&quot;mso-bidi-font-weight: bold\;&quot;&gt;development of certi
 ficates for V&amp;amp\;V of learning-enabled systems and -- with that -- ensur
 e a rigorous physical AI development for flight. An overview of different 
 projects at our lab that build upon this framework will be demonstrated to
  show different applications. In particular\, the presentation will cover 
 the flight tests of AirSTAR from NASA&amp;rsquo\;s 2007-2010 Aviation Safety p
 rogram\, Learjet flights from Edwards AFB from 2015-2018\, including a bri
 ef episode of Lockheed Martin&amp;rsquo\;s VISTA X-62 flight test achieving TR
 L-6 in 3g flight condition\, and many others.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

