Antenna Calibration Method SAE ARP-958 Rev E - Proposed Changes

#Lightning #Protection #EMC #EMI #Simulation #Test

IEEE Southeastern Michigan: Chapter VIII (EMC)

 

 


Southeastern Michigan IEEE EMC Chapter technical meeting.

This is a ZOOM on-line live presentation.  The ZOOM link will be provided via email to registrants the day before the event. 

This event will have door prizes, but you must be present to win!

Event video: https://youtu.be/QY7UT0oBSz0

Slides: https://www.emcsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/DRAFT-SAE-ARP-958E-revision-critique-Detroit-presentation.pdf

 

 Host:  SEM IEEE EMC Chapter 8

Meeting Sponsor: EMC Compliance

 



  Date and Time

  Location

  Hosts

  Registration



  • Date: 17 Jun 2021
  • Time: 09:30 PM UTC to 11:30 PM UTC
  • Add_To_Calendar_icon Add Event to Calendar
If you are not a robot, please complete the ReCAPTCHA to display virtual attendance info.
  • Canton, Michigan
  • United States

  • Southeastern Michigan Section Chapter, EMC27
  • Cedar Rapids Section Chapter, EMC27
  • Milwaukee Section Chapter, EMC27
  • West Michigan Section Chapter, EMC27
  • Contact Event Hosts
  • Co-sponsored by Kimball Williams
  • Starts 07 June 2021 06:33 PM UTC
  • Ends 17 June 2021 09:30 PM UTC
  • No Admission Charge


  Speakers

Ken Ken of EMC Compliance

SAE ARP-958 covers the calibration of antennas used at one-meter separation from the test sample.  This makes it a near field measurement, which is the key to the entire issue. Standards which make use of ARP-958 antenna calibrations are CISPR 25, MIL-STD-461 RE102, and RTCA/DO-160 section 21 for commercial aircraft.    

This presentation is about a problematical change in the subject revision to this half-century old document.  The proposed “E” revision requires separate horizontal and vertical antenna factor calibration for wire-type antennas. The original release was in 1968 and covered only log-spirals, so this wasn’t an issue. Revision A in 1992 added other antennas commonly used in shield room tests, including the biconical, log-periodic arrays, horns, and others.  Revisions B, C, and D followed with minor changes. Draft E with this new two-antenna factor requirement is another matter entirely.  

The parties promoting the change cite the automotive industry as demanding it.

The purpose of this presentation is to learn why this is, if indeed it is the case.  Spirited back and forth is not only encouraged, but the entire purpose of making this (virtual) journey to the belly of the beast...

Biography:

Ken Javor has worked in the EMC industry for over forty years. He is a consultant to government and industry, runs a pre-compliance EMI test facility, and curates the Museum of EMC Antiquities, a collection of radios and instruments that were important in the development of the discipline, as well as a library of important documentation. Mr. Javor is an industry representative to the Tri-Service Working Groups that write MIL-STD-464 and MIL-STD-461. He has published numerous papers and is the author of a handbook on EMI requirements and test methods. 

Mr. Javor can be contacted at ken.javor@emccompliance.com

Email: ken.javor@emccompliance.com

Address:Huntsville, Michigan, United States





Agenda

5:30  Networking

6:00 Presentation

 



Chapter website: http://www.emcsociety.org

To be added or removed from the Southeastern Michigan IEEE EMC email list, please send an email to scott@emcsociety.org  with ADD or REMOVE as the subject.